How do innovations affect the economy

Smart electric grids produce greater efficiency in monitoring energy consumption and contribute to more environment-friendly policies. Video conferencing facilities save government and businesses large amounts of money on their travel budgets. New digital platforms across a variety of policy domains spur utilization and innovation, and bring additional people, businesses, and services into the digital revolution.

In the education area, better technology infrastructure enables personalized learning and real-time assessment. Imagine schools where students master vital skills and critical thinking in a personalized and collaborative manner, teachers assess pupils in real-time, and social media and digital libraries connect learners to a wide range of informational resources. Teachers take on the role of coaches, students learn at their own pace, technology tracks student progress, and schools are judged based on the outcomes they produce.

These represent just a few of the examples where innovation is taking place. Technology fosters innovation, creates jobs, and boost long-term economic prosperity.

By improving communication and creating opportunities for data-sharing and collaboration, information technology represents an infrastructure issue as important as bridges, highways, dams, and buildings. To stimulate innovation, we need a number of policy actions.

Right now, the United States does not have a coherent or comprehensive innovation strategy. Unlike other nations, who think systematically about these matters, we make policy in a piecemeal fashion and focus on short versus long-term objectives.

This limits the efficiency and effectiveness of our national efforts. There are a number of areas that we need to address. Research and Development Tax Credits : An example of our national short-sightedness is the research and development tax credit. Members of Congress have extended this many times in recent years, but they generally do this on an annual basis.

Rather than extend this credit over a long period of time, they renew it episodically and never on a predictable schedule.

This makes it difficult for companies to plan investments and pursue consistent strategies over time. Due to political uncertainties and institutional politics, we end up creating inefficiencies linked to the vagaries of federal policymaking.

Commercializing University Knowledge : Universities represent a crucial linchpin in efforts to build an innovation economy. They are extraordinary knowledge generators, but must do a better job of transferring technology and commercializing knowledge. University licensing offices must speed up their review process in order to encourage the formation of businesses.

Universities should think more seriously about innovation metrics so they allocate resources efficiently and create the proper incentives. Right now, many places count the number of patents and licensing agreements without much attention to the businesses created, products that are marketed, or revenue that is generated.

They should make sure their resources and incentives are aligned with metrics that encourage technology transfer and commercialization. There are many dimensions of this challenge, but one of the most important concerns is the low number of college students graduating with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and math. Skills in these areas helped the country win the space race and the Cold War and we need them now as we transition to a technology driven economy.

Among other recommendations, the report emphasizes two actions: 1 hiring , new STEM teachers and 2 paying higher salaries to the top 5 percent of STEM teachers.

While creative destruction and associated patterns are not a new notion, what is different today is that innovation might occur across different entities — such as government as well as public or private firms — and inventors working across geographic boundaries. Innovation remains brisk, but if markets in the U. Like Seru, Stephen Haber and his colleagues used big data to analyze economic growth.

To build their geographical representation of economically powerful regions, they geocoded every major city in the world and, using a variety of sources, researched the level of economic activity at year intervals.

The study took three years. During the period when China was economically more advanced than the West, it traded goods like spices, silk, and tea for silver. At the time, the West had little else that the Chinese needed, Haber says. But that changed, and by the West had pulled ahead. Innovation made the difference — modern chemistry, steam power applied to transportation, and interchangeable parts — but not just innovations in technology. Modern economic growth also came from organizational innovations in the military, transportation, and the legal and financial worlds, Haber says.

Historically, China took the opposite approach: The state wielded the power to reject certain technologies. There are two ways to achieve economic growth: Add population or make people more productive, says Edward Lazear, a professor of economics at Stanford GSB. Economic growth in the 20th century was tremendous. The standard of living doubled every 33 years, but that made a challenging target for the 21st century. Slower population growth and aging of the current population imply that we will need productivity increases to do more of the work in the future.

Research Policy, 45 2 , — Coe, D. European Economic Review, 39 5 , — Corrado, C. Intangible capital and growth in advanced economies: measurement methods and comparative results. Discussion Paper, No. Innovation and intangible investment in Europe, Japan, and the United States. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29 2 , — Dachs, B.

Innovation, employment growth, and foreign ownership of firms: a European perspective. Research Policy, 43 1 , — Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Dickey, D. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root.

Econometrica, 49 4 , — Dosi, G. Sources, procedures, and macroeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26 3 , — Engle, R. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55 2 , — Fagerberg, J.

Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature, 32 3 , — Fan, P. Innovation capacity and economic development: China and India.

Economic Change and Restructuring, 44 1—2 , 49— Fisher, R. Statistical methods for research workers 4th ed. Freeman, C. The economics of industrial innovation. Furman, J. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31 , — Galindo, M. Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Management Decision, 51 3 , — Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: are feedback effects at work. Journal of Business Research, 67 5 , — Garcia, R. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review.

Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19 2 , — Goel, R. Research and development expenditures and economic growth: a cross-country study. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42 2 , — Granger, C.

Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48 3 , — Some recent developments in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics, 39 1—2 , — Griliches, Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28 4 , — Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94 1 , 29— European Economic Review, 21 1—2 , 89— Grossman, V.

Entrepreneurial innovation and economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 31 4 , — Grossman, G. Innovation and growth in the global economy. Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 1 , 23— Guloglu, B. A panel causality analysis of the relationship among research and development, innovation, and economic growth in high-income OECD countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 2 1 , 32— Hanley, A. Financial development and innovation in China: evidence from the provincial data.

Kiel Working Paper, No. Kiel Institute of World Economy, Hindenburgufer. Hassan, I. The innovation-economic growth nexus: global evidence. Research Policy, 39 10 , — Holtz-Eakin, D. Estimating vector auto regressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56 6 , — Howells, J. Innovation and regional economic development: a matter of perspective? Research Policy, 34 8 , — Hsu, P. Financial development and innovation: cross-country evidence.

Journal of Financial Economics, 1 , — Hsu, C. International Business Review, 24 , — Huang, K. Technology competencies in competitive environment. Journal of Business Research, 64 2 , — Hudson, J. Innovation, intellectual property rights, and economic development: a unified empirical investigation.

World Development, 46 1 , 66— Johansen, S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12 2—3 , — Kim, J. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92 , — King, R. Finance, entrepreneurship and economic growth: theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32 3 , — Kirchhoff, B.

Entrepreneurship and dynamic capitalism: the economics of business firm formation and growth. Westport: Praeger. Kwiatkowski, D.

Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54 1—3 , — Laeven, L. Financial innovation and endogenous growth.

Journal of Financial Intermediation, 24 1 , 1— Levine, A. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 1 , 1— Maddala, G. A comparative study of unit roots with panel data a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61 4 , — Malerba, F. Perspectives on innovation. Book Google Scholar. Mandel, M. The failed promise of innovation in the US.

Businessweek, June 3 , 26— Mansfield, E. Contribution of research and development to economic growth of the United States. Maurseth, P. Knowledge spillovers in Europe: a patent citation analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 4 , — Nadiri, I. Innovations and technological spillovers. Working Paper, No. Navas, A. Because organizations are often working with other individual organizations, it can sometimes be challenging to understand the impacts of innovation on our society at large.

There is, however, a lot more to innovation than just firms looking to achieve competitive advantage. Innovation really is the core reason for modern existence.

Although innovation can have some undesirable consequences , change is inevitable and in most cases, innovation creates positive change. Over the last decades, innovation has become a significant way to combat critical social risks and threats. For example, since the Industrial Revolution, energy-driven consumption of fossil fuels has led to a rapid increase in CO 2 emissions, disrupting the global carbon cycle and leading to a planetary warming impact.

Our society revolves around continuous economic growth, which mainly depends on population growth. The population is shrinking and ageing in the developed counties and is likely to do so in other parts of the world as well. It's responsible for resolving collective problems in a sustainable and efficient way, usually with new technology.

These new technologies, products and services simultaneously meet a social need and lead to improved capabilities and better use of assets and resources. In order to be able to solve these kinds of societal problems, private, public and non-profit sectors are involved. Because innovation has an impact on so many different parts of our society, it would be almost impossible to go through everything in one post. In general, the result of innovation should always be improvement.

Technological innovation is considered as a major source of economic growth. Economic growth refers to the increase in the inflation-adjusted market value of the goods and services produced by an economy over time. It is conventionally measured as the percent rate of increase in real gross domestic product , or real GDP. The latter describes the essence of innovation quite well. The purpose of innovation is to come up with new ideas and technologies that increase productivity and generate greater output and value with the same input.

If we look at the transformation of the US , once a largely agrarian economy that advanced from emerging nation status in the mid th century to an industrial economy by the First Wold War, we can see that the agricultural innovations and inventions were actually one of the largest factors that helped bring about the Industrial Revolution. Vast improvements in agricultural productivity had already previously transformed the way people work in Europe, releasing farmers for other activities and allowing them to move to the city for industrial work.

The shift from hand-made to machine-made products increased productivity, directly affecting living standards and growth. If previously one worker was able to feed only a fraction of their family, it was now possible for one person to produce more in less time to provide for the entire family. Technological advancement and increased productivity means major changes for careers today as well.