When was ww2 named

In , an Allied army crossed from Britain to free France from Nazi rule. One year later, Allied armies invaded Germany, forcing the Germans to surrender. World War 2 had ended. Perfect for teachers, homeschoolers and parents alike, the resource introduces children to the young girl whose tragic tale from WWII became a story of hope.

While you wait for it to be checked and approved why not to add a pre-selected message and a cool badge. All three recipients concurred with the term World War II. Finally, on August 31, the Assistant Chief of Staff, Operations Division, War Department, wrote the Army Chief of Staff and the Secretary of War, asking for the approval of the former and the signature of the latter to enclosed draft letters to the Secretary of the Navy and a joint letter to the President.

In this communication Lt. Hull, provided the basic background as had been written by General North on August 1. Henry L.

Stimson, the Secretary of War, wrote the Secretary of the Navy on September 5 with background information regarding the term World War II and the desire for its official recognition by the President. Stimson indicated to Secretary Forrestal that he had already signed the enclosed letter and recommended that if he concurred, the joint letter be sent to the President for approval.

President Wilson, under date of July 31, , addressed a letter to Secretary of War Baker which read, in part, as follows:. Analysis of publications and radio programs indicates that this term has been accepted by common usage.

At the bottom on this communication, President Truman, signed Approved, Sept. When did "World War 2" start being called "World War 2"? Ask Question. Asked 8 years, 9 months ago. Active 7 years ago. Viewed 43k times. Improve this question. Now I'm wondering how much before one person told me June which I am shocked by. Now, calling something WW before it happens isn't a stretch because we have a practice of numbering. I'm trying to see where that starts.

It wouldn't surprise me if the doomsayers were already referring to an expected future World War II or Second World War before it even started. The reason we don't mind talking about WW1 and WW2 is partly that post-Hiroshima it's mostly assumed that WW3 would be an unnecessary term, since it would probably all be over very quickly, and there wouldn't be many people left to talk about it afterwards. So it's not like we're going to have a very long sequence to remember.

This would be better off on history.